By admin 
What is the best teaching method? It is an exciting and endless quest, because education is an art in constant evolution. Debates and theories abound, each claiming to have the ultimate solution. But, let’s be honest, a single, universal method does not exist. On the contrary, teaching is a mosaic of approaches, a subtle alchemy between knowledge, pedagogy and listening to students. It is in this complexity that our true mission lies: to forge minds that are curious, creative and open to the world.
So, let’s immerse ourselves in this exciting quest, explore the multiple paths of teaching, and draw inspiration from great educational voices to build together a future where every student can flourish and grow. Because it is there, in this diversity and this incessant quest, that we find the true essence of our profession: training human beings capable of thinking, acting and shaping the world around them. Welcome to the adventure of teaching, where the only method that counts is the one that nourishes minds and awakens souls.
Here are the different teaching methods:
Teacher-centered method
Recognized as the most conventional approach, the teacher-centered methodology is based on the idea that the teacher has the primary responsibility in the learning environment. Teachers are in charge of the class and direct all activities. Typically in this approach, students sit at individual desks that face the teacher. Although group work may occur, the majority of class time is spent having the teacher explain concepts and completing individual work. In other words, students passively absorb information while the teacher actively transmits it.
Benefits :
This highlights the importance of the teacher’s role as facilitator. Although the teacher-centered approach has been criticized for promoting passive learning, no one can deny that students need the assistance of a teacher to develop their skills.
Being based on behavioral theory, this teaching method makes it easier to control changes in student behavior through direct instruction. It can be helpful to take the core of this approach and modify it according to the needs of the teacher and students, gradually shifting the focus from the teacher to the students.
Disadvantages:
Critics point out the lack of stimulation of student motivation. Indeed, the teacher-centered method, used blindly, may not leave students with enough freedom of mind and creativity.
It does little to promote the development of analytical thinking and problem-solving skills. Failing to provide enough opportunities for students to make their own choices can lead to a lack of decision-making skills and even an inability to think critically.
Work in small groups
Small group instruction typically follows whole group instruction and provides students with a reduced student-teacher ratio, typically in groups of four to six students. This method allows teachers to work more closely with each student on a specific learning objective , reinforce skills learned during whole-group instruction, and check for student understanding.
This teaching method is based on constant activities around workstations: groups work with the teacher and groups work independently on varied activities, such as the use of manipulatives or online computer resources.Lessons are adapted to the level of each student. This allows teachers to provide focused, differentiated instruction to small groups of students in a natural way. This helps the instructor more closely assess each student’s abilities and develop strategic plans based on those assessments.
This promotes students’ social adaptation skills. Students who have difficulty asking questions and participating in a large group may benefit from working in small groups, where they feel more comfortable and less overwhelmed.
This requires more time and effort to prepare materials and organize workstations for each group of students. Teachers need to think about each type of activity that will be offered at the workstations: they need to be equally engaging and effective.
Students may feel pressure to always be involved, always contribute to lessons, and always take some role in group work.
While we consider shifting the focus from the teacher to the students, the rest of the approaches on this list are considered student-centered or constructivist. With the development of the field of education and society in general, the idea of a student-centered approach has become more popular, and there are good reasons for this. nd assessment. Involving learners in these decisions places more responsibility and ownership on them rather than the teacher. Additionally, teachers must be comfortable with changing their leadership style from a directive to a consultative style. During this time, students can work in small groups, access centers and move freely around the classroom.